2020.07.08 07:30
코로나 바이러스의 출처
일본 생리학과 교수인 타스쿠 혼조(Tasuku Honjo) 박사는 코로나 바이러스가 자연적으로 발생한 것이 아니라 인위적으로 제조된 것이라 밝혀져 센세이션을 일으키고 있다.
자연적인 발생은 전 세계에 퍼지지 않는다.바이러스 성격에 따라 온도가 나라마다 다르기 때문이다.자연스러우면 중국과 같은 온도를 가진 국가에만 영향을 미쳤을 것이다.
동물과 바이러스에 대한 40년의 연구를 해왔다.이 바이러스는 제조 되었으며 바이러스는 완전히 인공적이다.
저는 중국 우한 연구소에서 4년간 일해왓다.이 실험의 모든 직원을 잘 알고 있기에 나는 코로나 사고후 그들 모두에게 전화를 걸었다.
그러나 모든 휴대전화는 불통이다.지금까지도 통화가 안된다.이제 이 모든 실험실 기술자가 사망한 것으로 추정된다.중국 공산당이 은폐하기 위해 죽인것 같다.
현재까지의 모든 지식과 연구를 바탕으로 코로나가 자연스럽지 않다는 100% 확신을 가지고 이것을 자신있게 말할수 있다.박쥐에서 나온 것이 아니다.중국이 그것을 만들었다.만약내가 말한 것이 지금 또는 심지어 죽은 후에도 거짓으로 판면되면 일본정부는 나의 노벨상을 철회해도 좋다. 중국은 거짓말을 하고 있으며 이 진실은 언젠가 모든 사람에게 드러날 것이다. Tasuku Honjo
|
2020.07.08 07:53
2020.07.08 08:51
During the COVID-19 pandemic, a false claim that Honjo believed that the novel coronavirus had been "manufactured" by a laboratory in the Chinese city of Wuhan was widely disseminated on the internet in many languages.[10] The BBC Reality Check team reported that, "In a statement published on the website of Kyoto University, he said he was 'greatly saddened' that his name had been used to spread 'false accusations and misinformation'. Scientists say genome sequencing shows that the virus came from animals and was not man-made."[10]
Of note, I found this in his Wikipedia.
This Nobel laureate 2018 made an official statement above at his university website that his name had been used to spread false accusations and misinformation.
He was greatly saddened by it, he said.
2020.07.08 09:13
"Scientists say genome sequencing shows that the virus came from animals and was not man-made."
I have heard this phrase a thousand times but there had been no actual explanation,
or who the scientist was. Can I see his(or their) name and face?
I wish they show me the genome sequencing and point his finger to the actual difference.
My feeling is that a casual commentator mentioned about genome sequencing theory
and then a huge bunch of idiots copied the same phrase without asking or knowing what it actually was.
Doc, did you really see the genome sequencing and could tell the difference?
I wish at least one person show me the evidence of why it is not.
To me, this cheater(imitator) of Dr. Tasuku Honjo sounds more likely the better and just explanation.
If the genome sequencing theory is such a sold one, why does the CCP refuses to allow the inspection team
and the FBI still wants to investigate? And why are Trump and some senators still talking about it?
Does anyone (including me) know what the hell the jargon of the "genome sequencing" is?
Does mutation of genes show where it happened, in animal, human, or in the lab?
This got to be an intra-viral change. Why does it have to do with the host animal or petri dish?
Someone, please, enlighten me.
2020.07.08 09:46
This is the latest review of the subject I could find which deals with the question you raised.
Unfortunately no 100% clear answer, only the weight of the circumstantial evidences.
2020.07.08 12:50
"...Shi has refuted suggestions that the lab has ever had a virus similar to SARS-CoV-2, and has previously cautioned about the risks of another SARS-like disease emerging from animals. “She had actually warned us that there are bat viruses in nature that can spill over to humans,” says Volker Thiel, a virologist at the University of Bern...." (Quoted from above link)
So, some bright and cute Chinese scientists got an idea of using this particular virus with an animal genetic sequence.
At the direction of CCCP, WIV started to work in modifying the virus for use in germ warfare.
Here, whatever animal it came from, it totally does not matter once it is modified by a human virologist.
See, Chinese virologist created COVID-19 from a strain, for example, from a bat (or any other animals).
Now, this one has the genetic sequence of a bat virus.
Because of that, nobody can deny that it was not created by a human!! Are you kidding me?
What a stupid conclusion is that? Give me a break.
It simply was created by a human with a virus that had the genetic sequence of bat virus.
Some idiot said, "since this virus has the genetic sequence of a bat virus, it must not be a human-made virus." LOL!
WIV might have the capability to modify any damn animal virus into a human-made virus.
It is very possible that they created COVID-19 either by their intention or by lucky accident.
They didn't even know what they created. So, they handled the new virus in a sloppy manner.
They soon realized they have created a monster but too late. By then, people were dying already.
The CCP was notified and they came down and said, "Shut Up, otherwise, you will disappear!"
So, what the fucking genetic sequence has anything to do with who made the virus; animal, or human?
Remember, you do not create a virus from scratch with an amino acid or two.
Instead, you use an animal-made virus and then modify the sucker by changing a few amino acids
or it's sequence, into the desired virus that is virulent and can infect human beings. That's what WIV did.
By now, there is no evidence left in WIV. The CCP got rid of everything.
There is only circumstantial evidence left, such as they tried to coverup the initial finding of the new virus
and they will not allow international investigators to enter Wuhan or WIV. They are guilty for sure.
The international politics calls for punishment of the damn CCP and put them into a corner
for a tactical advantage of the free world, regardless they are guilty or not. The fun starts here.
For the same reason, I will keep this Honjo's article here. The CCP deserves it.
No. | Subject | Date | Author | Last Update | Views |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Notice | How to write your comments onto a webpage [2] | 2016.07.06 | 운영자 | 2016.11.20 | 18193 |
Notice | How to Upload Pictures in webpages | 2016.07.06 | 운영자 | 2018.10.19 | 32343 |
Notice | How to use Rich Text Editor [3] | 2016.06.28 | 운영자 | 2018.10.19 | 5919 |
Notice | How to Write a Webpage | 2016.06.28 | 운영자 | 2020.12.23 | 43838 |
217 | Juju Chang as ABC "Good Morning America" anchor [2] | 2009.12.20 | 운영자 | 2009.12.20 | 28289 |
216 | 10 Discounts Seniors Get Only If They Know (2016) [1] | 2016.10.14 | 운영자 | 2016.10.18 | 24440 |
215 | Medicare fund will last extra 12 years — maybe [4] | 2010.08.05 | 운영자 | 2010.08.05 | 18045 |
214 | Escape from the Mayo Clinic [1] | 2018.08.19 | 운영자 | 2018.08.19 | 14244 |
213 | [초청, 안내] 정운찬 전 국무총리 초청 모금강연회 | 2011.01.10 | 조동준*64 | 2011.01.10 | 10559 |
212 | 세계적 惡評 받는 한국인의 두 가지 식습관과 유래 2 [3] | 2010.09.06 | 김건언*65 | 2010.09.06 | 10348 |
211 | 포도주의 역사 [2] | 2009.09.16 | 이종구*57 | 2009.09.16 | 10203 |
210 | 보르도 와인 | 2009.10.21 | 이종구*57 | 2009.10.21 | 10170 |
209 | 포도주는 어떻게 만들어지나 | 2009.10.14 | 이종구*57 | 2009.10.14 | 9989 |
208 | Wine 레이블을 읽는 방법 [3] | 2009.09.23 | 이종구*57 | 2009.09.23 | 9902 |
207 | 포도주에 대한 기본 상식 [1] | 2009.08.26 | 이종구*57 | 2009.08.26 | 9885 |
206 | Good looking fancy fonts [3] | 2010.10.09 | 운영자 | 2010.10.09 | 9577 |
205 | 포도의 종류 [1] | 2009.09.30 | 이종구*57 | 2009.09.30 | 9511 |
204 | 발포성 와인 (Sparkling wine) | 2009.11.11 | 이종구*57 | 2009.11.11 | 9496 |
203 | [re] UN: Radiation to Hit U.S. By Friday | 2011.03.17 | 운영자 | 2011.03.17 | 9493 |
202 | Temporary down of our website | 2011.01.10 | 운영자 | 2011.01.10 | 9477 |
201 | 함춘 시계탑 e-동문 마당 제 5호, 2009 하반기 소식 [1] | 2010.03.08 | 운영자 | 2010.03.08 | 9430 |
200 | [고추] 와 Prostate Cancer (옴김) [2] | 2010.06.24 | 한원민*65 | 2010.06.24 | 9390 |
199 | 인천상륙 60주년을 기념, San Francisco [2] | 2010.09.16 | Rover | 2010.09.16 | 9377 |
198 | 국가정상화추진위원회 親北인사 100명 발표 [4] | 2010.03.12 | Rover | 2010.03.12 | 9108 |
This is one of the stories floating around in the Kakao Talk.
I do not know how reliable this is.
But I still have the suspicion that COVID-19 is a biological warfare product,
intensionally made in the Wuhan Virus Lab by the Cheating Chinese Communist Party (CCCP).
There was a lot of talk saying that the COVID-19 was not man-made
but those people had never explained with concrete evidence why they believed so.
CCCP together with their idiotic followers in South Korea should be exterminated
as soon as possible. In the same line of thinking, I am with Donald Trump.
But, unfortunately, the chances are Trump will be just talking loud without much action.