"외세는 그것이 사라 지는 것을 원치 않기 때문이다....."

우리가 "도마 위에 올려진 먹기 좋은 죽은 생선"이 아니될려면,

결국은 "김정은"의 Nuclear weapon이 해답이 아닌가?

Because of the nuclear power and ICBM, he amassed a power to be reckoned with!

Look ! Now, even Donald Trump wants to meet 김정은 face to face.

Look how much respect Kim gets from US, China, and Japan now!

This shows the enormous power and authority of 김정은. It shows right here!

Nobody else in North or South Korea has ever achieved this much respect and power in our history.

본인은 철저한 반공주의 사상의 사람이지만, 우리는 김정은의 공적을 인정 해야되지 않을가?

We should change our thinking attitude toward the nuclear power of North Korea.

It looks like a curse to South Korea but it may very well be a blessing for all (both) Koreas.

Is that why the younger people of Korea supported 문재인?

Are we, the old Koreans like us, supporting the wrong political or ideological idea?

Even though I am "absolutely NOT for" the communist regime in North Korea,

but I may be "for" the nuclear power North Korea has achieved.

That might have been the "Only Way" by which we could get out of being a weak slave nation

for the first time in our history since the 고구려 empire.

http://blog.koreadaily.com/view/myhome.html?fod_style=B&med_usrid=barndrive&fod_no=1&cid=1022569

(j 브로그; 역사 수필<온기철>: 통일는 왜 우리 끼리 해야 하는 가?)

Thank you, WM! It is a very good point.

"Dependency on Foreign Nation" has led us to two nations in one country. Unfortunately, even now, North is

dependent on China and South on U.S.A.. Foreign dependency is just like a candy that weak nation craves to

defend against foreign interference. Building a strong nation, economically and militarily, is essential to advance

national interest. Nuclear capability has made North Korea very strong militarily. Kim is doing his father could

not do. His father walked away from "6 nation talk" because he did not have a good leverage. Now North Korea

has 18 bombs and probable ICBM capability. He is confident that he can get what he wants from U.S., China,

Japan, Russia and South Korea.

Kim is envisioning 박정희 and 등소평. Both were dictators, but achieved a miracularous economic growth that

made people out of hunger in expense of political oppression. It is a prelude of democracy. When democarcy

comes to North Korea, it is likely to have one nation in Korean pininsula.

It had been my long belief that the regime has to change for any talk with North Korea to make sense. But

Surprisingly, the regime is changing by itself. It is starting to make sense. The opportunistic Korean government

is doing a good job.

God bless Korea, so far, so good. Trust, but verify!

Our WM and Dr. Ohn articulated very well what's in the minds of many Koreans.

I appreciate the clear analysis of you two gentlemen in the context of Korea's modern history.

The only thing many Koreans like me can do is to pray hard to God that

HE would show the leaders of Korea the right path to a permanent peace of our fatherland.

The sovereign nation can not depend on her defense on foreign troops. Korean people saw the disastrous 

result of 500 year dependency. They lost their own country. And ended up having two nations in one country.

일제 강점기 말기인 1944-5년경 육당 최남선은 만주 건국 대학 교수 였다. 일제가 학병 모집에 혈안이 되어 있었던

시대 이다. 제자 중 한 사람(박수길)이 학병 지원에 대해서 상의 하러 최남선을 찾아 왔다. 최남선은 “우리나라가 망한

것은 힘이 없어서 인데, 나라의 힘 중 가장 중요 한 것은 군사력이며, 우리민족이 군사 훈련을 받을 수 있는 기회를 

하나님이 주신 것”이라고 말 하여 학병 지원을 권 했다.

요지음의 북한은 독자적인 군사력은 있으나 경제력이 취약하고 남쪽은 경제력은 선진국 문턱에 있는 데,

국가 안보를 미국에 의지 하고 있다. 자주 국방을 할 수 있는 경제력이 있는 데도 말이다. 외국 군대가 

자주 독립국가에 주둔 하고 있을 때 서로의 국익이 동일 할 때는 별 문제가 없다. Divergence of interst

는 언제 든지 발생 할 수 있고 손해 보는 것은 약자의 몫이다. 강한 나라에는 외국군대가 필요 없고 강한

나라가 되기 위해서는 군사력과 경제력 모두를 갖추 어야 한다. 중국의 부상, 북한의 핵과 남북 관계의

개선은 남한과 미국의 이익이 달라 잘 우려가 많이 있다.