logo

English
                 

What You Need to Know

About Mitt Romney's 2011 Tax Return


By MATTHEW O'BRIEN  - Matthew O'Brien is an associate editor at The Atlantic covering business and economics. He has previously written for The New Republic. Written on SEP 22 2012


Picture by Reuters: Meet the new Romney tax return, nearly the same as the old Romney tax return.

With a brilliantly glaring spotlight behind and wonderful smiles in front,
here is Romney preaching heaven for us all !! Or is he ?? Read below.

It was quite the disclosure day for the Romney campaign. Aside from releasing the broad outlines of how much he paid between 1990 and 2009, the Romney campaign also sent out his 2011 tax return. It was 379 pages of disclosures that mostly disclosed what we already knew from his 2010 tax return: Romney makes a lot of money, he gets a lot of money from offshore investment accounts, and he gives away a lot of money. Oh, and he pays a very low effective federal tax rate -- lower than what many middle-class households pay. Here's what you need to know.

(1) Romney paid a 14.1 percent effective federal tax rate in 2011 -- and it could have been lower. Romney had an adjusted gross income of $13,696,951 in 2011 and paid $1.95 million in taxes, for a cool 14.1 percent. Romney manages such a low rate because most of his income comes from capital gains -- which is taxed at 15 percent, instead of the 35 percent Romney would otherwise pay. But Romney could have paid even less this year. He didn't take the full deduction he could have on his charitable giving. After all, he's running for office, for Pete's sake -- and he pledged to have never paid less than a 13 percent rate. Noam Scheiber of The New Republic calculates that Romney could have saved $262,500 -- for a 12.2 percent effective rate -- if he had taken the full deduction he was entitled to.

(2) Romney's income mostly comes from investment funds located offshore. The tax returns of the rich are different from yours and mine. They mostly detail offshore investment holdings. As Zach Carter of the Huffington Post points out, 266 of the 379 pages of Romney's 2011 taxes are about foreign corporations and partnerships. Read that again. These funds are not set up overseas so that people like Mitt Romney can avoid taxes. These funds are set up overseas so that institutions like university endowments can avoid taxes.

Tax-exempt entities face a special tax called the unrelated business income tax (UBIT). When they own a part of a business, they have to pay UBIT on whatever income they get from it -- otherwise these businesses would have the competitive advantage of not having to pay taxes. That actually happened when some alums donated the Mueller Macaroni Company to NYU Law School back in 1948. What does this have to do with investment funds? Well, most funds -- including for private equity shops like Bain Capital -- are set up as distinct corporate entities. Big investors like university endowments would face the 35 percent UBIT on top of 15 percent capital gains taxes if these funds were set up in the United States. So they don't. They set them up in the Cayman Islands instead.

(3) Romney still benefits from the so-called carried interest loophole. Imagine if you could have your wages taxed as capital gains instead of as wages. That would be a pretty sweet deal if your marginal tax rate is greater than the 15 percent capital gains tax rate. That sweet deal is what private equity managers, hedge funders and venture capitalists call "carried interest". These financiers get to classify the fees they earn on profits as capital gains, even when it's not their capital at risk. Among the people who thinks this makes no sense are Romney economic adviser Greg Mankiw. Romney still gets carried interest, because he still gets a share of Bain Capital's profits as a part of his retirement package. What's not clear is just how much carried interest he gets. Romney estimated it would be $5.5 million for 2011 -- but that was back when he thought he would make $20.9 million for the year, rather than the $13.7 million he actually did. In either case, it saved him a nice pile of cash.

(4) Romney donated a lot to charity. Romney gave away nearly $4 million of his $13.7 million in income to charity in 2011. But, as previously mentioned, he only deducted $2.25 million of this giving.
***
The biggest revelation here is that it's good to be rich. But we already knew that from Romney's 2010 tax return. As my colleague Derek Thompson points out, Romney benefits from the preferential taxation of capital gains, from the crazy loophole that lets him count more income as capital gains, and from the best accountant money can buy. There's nothing scandalous about this -- other than the system that makes it possible. Now, there are good arguments about efficiency for keeping capital gains taxes low, as Matt Yglesias of Slate points out. But there are also good arguments about equity for not letting the super-rich pay less in taxes than the middle class.

It's almost as if we should have an election about this. (End of O'Brien's quote)



If you had any of trouble understanding above writing,
please just read below.
It's easier to understand in more plain language by me.

Romney is not qualified to become president,
as Romney himself had said already !

When Romney released his 2011 tax return today, it showed that while he contributed $4,000,000 to charity, he only claimed $2,250,000 in deductions. This meant that his 14.1% tax rate was higher than it should have been, or, to put it plainly, he paid more in taxes that he was legally required to do.

Back in June, when he was on his comically disastrous trip to Europe, he said the following in response to a question about how much he'd paid in taxes over the years. "Frankly, if I had paid more than was legally due, I don't think I'd be qualified to become president."

So there you have it. In his own words, by his own actions, Mitt Romney admits he's unqualified to be president.

And what's funny about the charity deduction is this: he claimed earlier in the year that he had never paid less than 13% in taxes. If he had claimed the full charitable deduction, his rate last year would have been below 13%. His accountants went back and retroactively changed his return so that it wouldn't violate the "less than 13%" pledge. The hole just gets deeper and deeper.

And what's truly amazing is that, win or lose, he can go back after the election and amend his taxes so that he claims the entire $4,000,000 and lower his taxes below 13% when the spotlight is off him.

How would you like this neat trick? You can legally refile and reclaim the deduction of your income tax at anytime within 3 years. His accountant will do it for him without any doubt !!
This is a dirty trick. Romney and his accountant think they can cheat us again.
(Partially mixed with a quote from "tschmath" at Ugly Hedgedog)

Now, let's talk about Romney's big charitable donation.
Just by the mathematical figure, Romney looks like a great charitable person, or is he?

I don't know exact details his donations. But my guess is that most of the portion were given to his Mormon church where such contributions (10% of income or so) are mandatory. So, his contribution was for his own religious passport to the heaven, not for the humanity or America in general. It was not a true contribution to our society. I know the contribution to one's church is legally deductible. But, morally, I am not even sure it can be deductible. Morality is very important thing for a truly religous (?) man like Romney and for the presidential candidate of the honest (?) Republican Party.

Let's be honest, at least while campaigning for the presidency. If Romney really has to or wants to lie, he should have made sure it's good enough to be able to cheat everyone.
He loves to make a stupid shallow lies that everyone can figure out. That's how stupid he is.
Romney has been walking on numerous stupid trails all along, including Palestine culture vs Israel's, 47% of American people fiasco, and other numerous etc.

Any doctor willing to vote for Romney for his stupidity ??


No. Subject Date Author Last Update Views
Notice How to write your comments onto a webpage [2] 2016.07.06 운영자 2016.11.20 17768
Notice How to Upload Pictures in webpages 2016.07.06 운영자 2018.10.19 31850
Notice How to use Rich Text Editor [3] 2016.06.28 운영자 2018.10.19 5493
Notice How to Write a Webpage 2016.06.28 운영자 2020.12.23 43427
613 "8.10" 독도의 기적과 그때 그시절 [6] 2012.08.23 운영자 2012.08.23 4230
612 [한국정치] 안철수 벗기고, 박근혜 때리기 [5] 2012.08.24 임춘훈*Guest 2012.08.24 4684
611 [한국정치] 문재인 국무총리-김제동 문화부장관? [2] 2012.08.30 임춘훈*Guest 2012.08.30 5066
610 "요런 미친 놈들이 .." [3] 2012.09.17 민경탁*65 2012.09.17 5735
609 [한국정치] Now, What happens to 안철수? [4] 2012.09.17 임춘훈*Guest 2012.09.17 5005
608 [re] 문재인 민주통합당 대통령후보 수락 연설문 [5] 2012.09.17 김이영*66 2012.09.17 5362
607 문재인 민주통합당 대통령후보 수락 연설문 [11] 2012.09.16 김이영*66 2012.09.16 4622
606 [한국정치] 안철수 총리, 문재인 대통령으로 담판? [3] 2012.09.20 임춘훈*Guest 2012.09.20 5561
605 박근혜새누리당대통령후보 수락연설문 [1] 2012.09.21 김이영*66 2012.09.21 4105
604 안철수 대통령출마선언문 전문 [6] 2012.09.21 김이영*66 2012.09.21 3789
603 [re] Ann Coulter: ‘Civil rights are for blacks' [2] 2012.09.23 운영자 2012.09.23 3305
» A dirty trick : Romney's 2011 Tax Return [3] 2012.09.23 운영자 2012.09.23 1867
601 [한국정치] 박근혜진영 ‘함락’되는 날 [5] 2012.09.28 임춘훈*Guest 2012.09.28 4235
600 [한국정치] 전남 교수 186명 박근혜후보 지지 선언 [6] 2012.10.02 Rover 2012.10.02 5763
599 [한국정치] ‘속물교수’ 전성시대 [1] 2012.10.05 임춘훈*Guest 2012.10.05 5402
598 [한국정치] 문재인 진영에 모여드는‘웬갖’ 잡새들 [2] 2012.10.11 임춘훈*Guest 2012.10.11 5193
597 Europeans skeptic on Nobel Peace Prize [4] 2012.10.12 운영자 2012.10.12 8496
596 [한국정치] 문재인, ‘울보 대통령’ 될까 [1] 2012.10.18 임춘훈*Guest 2012.10.18 5052
595 [Korean Politics] Geun-Hye Park, Uncertain President? [7] 2012.10.25 임춘훈*Guest 2012.10.25 5068
594 [Korean Politics] 안철수와 ‘변태 의원’ 김광진 [6] 2012.11.08 임춘훈*Guest 2012.11.08 3575