2011.02.28 19:03
BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC. To the Shareholders of Berkshire Hathaway Inc.: The per-share book value of both our Class A and Class B stock increased by 13% in 2010. Over the last 46 years (that is, since present management took over), book value has grown from $19 to $95,453, a rate of The highlight of 2010 was our acquisition of Burlington Northern Santa Fe, a purchase that’s working out even better than I expected. It now appears that owning this railroad will increase Berkshire’s “normal” earning power by nearly 40% pre-tax and by well over 30% after-tax. Making this purchase increased our share count by 6% and used $22 billion of cash. Since we’ve quickly replenished the cash, the economics of this transaction have turned out very well.......... abridged... ....... abridged.... This home office crew has my deepest thanks and deserves yours as well. Come to our Woodstock for Capitalism on April 30th and tell them so.
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ 운영자 Note: The above partial report is here, just to show you the authenticity of the report. This is a very long business and investment report that you may not be interested in. But if you want to be a good investor, you should read to see how the company is being run and what Warren Buffet is thinking in this trying time of economic difficulties. There is a lot to learn. Click the following if you want to read the entire report. http://www.berkshirehathaway.com/letters/2010ltr.pdf The small memo below is what I want you to read. To: Berkshire Hathaway Managers (“The All-Stars”) cc: Berkshire Directors From: Warren E. Buffett Date: July 26, 2010 This is my biennial letter to reemphasize Berkshire’s top priority and to get your help on succession planning (yours, not mine!). The priority is that all of us continue to zealously guard Berkshire’s reputation. We can’t be perfect but we can try to be. As I’ve said in these memos for more than 25 years: “We can afford to lose money – even a lot of money. But we can’t afford to lose reputation – even a shred of reputation.” We must continue to measure every act against not only what is legal but also what we would be happy to have written about on the front page of a national newspaper in an article written by an unfriendly but intelligent reporter. Sometimes your associates will say “Everybody else is doing it.” This rationale is almost always a bad one if it is the main justification for a business action. It is totally unacceptable when evaluating a moral decision. Whenever somebody offers that phrase as a rationale, in effect they are saying that they can’t come up with a good reason. If anyone gives this explanation, tell them to try using it with a reporter or a judge and see how far it gets them. If you see anything whose propriety or legality causes you to hesitate, be sure to give me a call. However, it’s very likely that if a given course of action evokes such hesitation, it’s too close to the line and should be abandoned. There’s plenty of money to be made in the center of the court. If it’s questionable whether some action is close to the line, just assume it is outside and forget it. As a corollary, let me know promptly if there’s any significant bad news. I can handle bad news but I don’t like to deal with it after it has festered for awhile. A reluctance to face up immediately to bad news is what turned a problem at Salomon from one that could have easily been disposed of into one that almost caused the demise of a firm with 8,000 employees. Somebody is doing something today at Berkshire that you and I would be unhappy about if we knew of it. That’s inevitable: We now employ more than 250,000 people and the chances of that number getting through the day without any bad behavior occurring is nil. But we can have a huge effect in minimizing such activities by jumping on anything immediately when there is the slightest odor of impropriety. Your attitude on such matters, expressed by behavior as well as words, will be the most important factor in how the culture of your business develops. Culture, more than rule books, determines how an organization behaves. In other respects, talk to me about what is going on as little or as much as you wish. Each of you does a first-class job of running your operation with your own individual style and you don’t need me to help. The only items you need to clear with me are any changes in post-retirement benefits and any unusually large capital expenditures or acquisitions. * * * * * * * * * * * * I need your help in respect to the question of succession. I’m not looking for any of you to retire and I hope you all live to 100. (In Charlie’s case, 110.) But just in case you don’t, please send me a letter (at home if you wish) giving your recommendation as who should take over tomorrow if you should become incapacitated overnight. These letters will be seen by no one but me unless I’m no longer CEO, in which case my successor will need the information. Please summarize the strengths and weaknesses of your primary candidate as well as any possible alternates you may wish to include. Most of you have participated in this exercise in the past and others have offered your ideas verbally. However, it’s important to me to get a periodic update, and now that we have added so many businesses, I need to have your thoughts in writing rather than trying to carry them around in my memory. Of course, there are a few operations that are run by two or more of you – such as the Blumkins, the Merschmans, the pair at Applied Underwriters, etc. – and in these cases, just forget about this item. Your note can be short, informal, handwritten, etc. Just mark it “Personal for Warren.” Thanks for your help on all of this. And thanks for the way you run your businesses. You make my job easy. WEB/db P.S. Another minor request: Please turn down all proposals for me to speak, make contributions, intercede with the Gates Foundation, etc. Sometimes these requests for you to act as intermediary will be accompanied by “It can’t hurt to ask.” It will be easier for both of us if you just say “no.” As an added favor, don’t suggest that they instead write or call me. Multiply 76 businesses by the periodic “I think he’ll be interested in this one” and you can understand why it is better to say no firmly and immediately. |
2011.02.28 19:20
2011.03.01 07:14
2011.03.01 11:56
Dr. Lee, thanks for your input.
I didn't know there was such a personal story (tragedy or blessing?) behind him.
Afterwards, I have looked into the details such as the following example:
Buffett and his wife Susan were married more than 50 years, but it was not a typical marriage. They separated in 1977, but still attended social functions as husband and wife, and she still sat on Berkshire's board as a major stockholder. She lived in San Francisco until her death in 2004, while Buffett and his paramour, Astrid Menks, lived together in Omaha. Susan introduced Menks to her husband, and they remained friends. When acquaintances received presents from the Buffett family, the card was often signed by all three of them. (Note: Paramour = an illicit lover, especially of a married person.) |
It's a strange (!!) story.
I wouldn't know how to deal with such findings in Buffett's private life.
Probably, if all went well, it's just a private business between Susan, Astrid, and Warren.
Anyway, personal things aside, we may just focus on his business success.
By having been successful, he made a lot of money for numerous people.
Instead of stealing, he has kept his promise and fulfilled the wishes of many many investors.
It's remarkable. Very few financial managers have done that.
As you might have guessed by reading this memo by Warren Buffett,
for truly rich people, what counts is the honor, not the money.
To them, reputation is the most precious thing.
Mubarak and Gadhafi might have billions in their Swiss bank accounts
but they are nothing but beggars in the street.
So are some of our ex-presidents of South Korean Republic.