2022.08.30 11:20
In August 2021, Matthew Schrag, a neuroscientist and physician at Vanderbilt University, got a call that would plunge him into a maelstrom of possible scientific misconduct. A colleague wanted to connect him with an attorney investigating an experimental drug for Alzheimer’s disease called Simufilam. The drug’s developer, Cassava Sciences, claimed it improved cognition, partly by repairing a protein that can block sticky brain deposits of the protein amyloid beta (Aβ), a hallmark of Alzheimer’s. The attorney’s clients—two prominent neuroscientists who are also short sellers who profit if the company’s stock falls—believed some research related to Simufilam may have been “fraudulent,” according to a petition later filed on their behalf with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA).
2022.08.30 12:37
2022.08.30 16:50
https://youtu.be/gClM3duTrGc
알츠하이머 병 논문조작 황우석 사건과 비슷
2022.09.01 22:18
As you might have seen my comments on the "so-called" scientific research papers
in the articles on our website, I very seldom trust them to be honest.
Generally, it may be true that a lot of researchers are hungry rats who only exist
to feed their hungry stomachs with research grants. The majority of research grants are
wasted money for nothing. And the waste calls for more waste.
I say it is safe not to trust what they say unless they show definitely favorable results
that are undisputerble.
I hate the phrase, such as "eminent professor", "remarkable scientist" and similar.
세상에 어떻게 이런 일이! 너무나 어처구니 없는 일이어서
말이 않나옵니다. 꼭 읽어 보세요.