2012.03.07 17:08
Today, I was again in orientation in Vacaville Medical Prison.
One hour was devoted to early (cerca 1970) social psychology experiments done at Yale and Stanford University. Recruited paid nurses, house wives, etc male and female volunteers, all just ordinary US citizens were
experimantal subjects.
According to the prototocol, they were supposed to give electric shock to the experimental human subjects, going up from 50 volt, 60 volt,.. 150 volt, dangerous range.
The "shock givers" were told they had an option of stopping the electric shock as the shock receivers began to scream due to the pain from the shock.
The shock givers became very nervous and disturbed, as they began to see the pain of the shock receivers.
About 40% of shock givers said "I cannot do this experiemnt any more" and walked out, but 60% kept
continuing the experiments, as they were convinced that the research design by the big universities had
overriding moral and academic values, "authority figure."
These days we cannot do this kind of experiemnts of course, even if participnts consented.
What these experiements tell us is that "human brain is hard wired to follow the boss, authority figure"
whether it is a dictator or government. That is the mechanism of the war machinery, whether they were
Japanese kamikaje pilot, Nazi concentration camp guards, or North Korean female soldier who shot S.
Korean tourist in Mt. Kumgang resort area.
Why the Syrian army soldiers keep shooting civilian demonstrators?
Why those 9-11 terrorists committed suicide mission in New York?
Highly educated artists with delicate mind sets could avoid this trap?
Here is the answer.
1.
A quotation from a Korean writer
"Those who attended secondary school in Korea during the 1960s or 1970s probably remember three
Western writers and their romantic writings that appeared in textbooks. Alphonse Daudet`s "The Stars,
" Pushkin`s "Should Your Life Sometimes Deceive You," and Anton Schnack`s "Things That Make Us Sad." These writers left everlasting impressions on the tender minds of the Korean youth who were enchanted by their beautifully written, profoundly moving literary works.
But the most moving piece was German poet Anton Schnack`s "Things That Make Us Sad." The poet writes that we become sad when we come across certain things in our life: "father`s letter accidentally found years after his death," "a funeral procession in June" and "the pale face of a prisoner behind bars."
Schnack continues to say that we become sad when we see the narrow shoulders of a woman in a luxury
car and arrogant childhood friends who have become powerful politicians or presidents of a large company. Schnack`s list goes on: "sunken eyes of starving children," "desperate eyes of a tiger in the zoo" and
"lonely actresses of wandering vaudevilles." "
3.
Anton Schnack`s "Things That Make Us Sad."
It begins,
"울음 우는 아이들은 우리를 슬프게 한다.
Crying children make us feel sad.
정원 한편 구석에서 발견된 작은 새의 시체 위에 초추(初秋)의 양광(陽光)이 떨어져 있을 때, 대체로 가을은 우리를 슬프게 한다.
In the corner of the garden, early autumn sun sheds bright light upon a small bird, died not long ago,
that makes us sad .
그래서, 가을날 비는 처량히 내리고, 그리운 이의 인적(人跡)은 끊어져 거의 일 주일이나 혼자 있게 될 때.
Drizzling autumn rain continues and I have been alone nearly for a week.
아무도 살지 않는 옛 궁성, 그래서, 벽은 헐어서 흙이 떨어지고, 어느 문설주의 삭은 나무 위에 거의 판독(判讀)하기 어려운 문자를 볼 때.
An empty old castle, the walls are breaking away, and I see some graffitti hard to decifer.
숱한 세월이 흐른 후에, 문득 돌아가신 아버지의 편지가 발견될 때.
Suddenly, I find old letters from my father, who has long gone.
그 곳에 씌었으되, "나의 사랑하는 아들이여, 너의 소행(所行)이 내게 얼마나 많은 불면(不眠)의 밤을 가져오게 했는가…….
There I read, "My dear son, what you did gave me many sleepless nights,...
"
3.
Today, I read something unexpected, that makes me very sad:
reading the life of this great poet.
이분 간단한 일생기를 Wikipedia 위키페디아서 여기 전재.
His father was a military man, I can understand.
He joined the first WW I together with Hitler, I understand that also!
But why he did this?
"He was one of the 88 writers who pledged their allegiance to Adolf Hitler in October 1933 in a Vow of
Most Faithful Allegiance (Gelöbnis treuester Gefolgschaft)
Furthermore, at his age of 55, he joined Nazi army and became a prisoner of US Army during the second WW II.
I now understand why they removed his essay from Korean school text books .
Anton Schnack (21 July 1892 – 26 September 1973)
Early life
Schnack was born in Rieneck, Lower Franconia, Bavaria. He was the third child of a station commander of the German gendarmerie. His older brother Friedrich Schnack (1888–1977) also became a writer, known for his works on natural history and children's literature.[2]
Schack followed his father's official postings around Bavaria, to Dettelbach, Kronach and Hammelburg. He attended the Progymnasium in Hammelburg (predecessor of the Frobenius-Gymnasium Hammelburg). He became a journalist, and worked in Halberstadt and Bolzano.[2]
Schnack served in the German Army in the First World War. He was wounded in 1916. He began to publish poetry in Die Aktion in 1915, but only published poetry on war subjects from 1917. His first war poem was "Schwester Maria" ("Sister Maria"), published in Die Aktion in January 1917.[1] He continued to publish war poems in three collections that he published in 1919, Strophen der Gier ("Verses of greed"), Der Abenteurer ("The adventurer") and Die tausend Gelächter ("The thousand laughs").
His published his most significant collection of war poetry, Tier rang gewaltig mit Tier ("Beast strove mightily with beast") in 1920, in a limited edition of 1,000 copies.[2] This short work of around 80 pages contains 60 poems based on the sonnet form, on themes of night and death.[3] In his 1985 book in German war poetry, Patrick Bridgwater, Emeritus Professor of German at the University of Durham, described Schnack's book as "the best single collection produced by a German war poet in 1914-1918",[4] and one work, "Nächtliche Landschaft", as the "best poem of the war written in German".
His poem "Verdun" was published in 1919 in the first edition of the socialist journal Das Tribunal. He also wrote a remarkable poem about desertion, entitled Der Überlaufer ("The deserter").[5]
After the end of the First World War, he became an editor in Darmstadt. From 1920 to 1925, he was an literary editor and theatre critic for the Neuen Badischen Landes-Zeitung in Mannheim. He married Maria Glöckler on 24 October 1924. He travelled in France, Italy and Dalmatia before returning to Mannheim and then settled in Berchtesgaden. He was one of the 88 writers who pledged their allegiance to Adolf Hitler in October 1933 in a Vow of Most Faithful Allegiance (Gelöbnis treuester Gefolgschaft).[6] He published lighter popular works in the 1930s and 1940s, including his 1935 work Kleines Lesebuch.[2] In addition to his poetry, he also wrote some short plays, a few novellas and two novels, Zugvögel der Liebe (1936) and Der finstere Franz (1937). His later works have less literary merit, and are overshadowed by his support for the Nazis.
He moved to Frankfurt am Main in 1937, and joined the Wehrmacht (German Army) in 1944. He was captured by US forces. After the Second World War, he settled to Kahl am Main, where he later died in 1973.[2]
4.
This is well known too.
Also from Wikipedia.
Racism and antisemitism
"Wagner's writings on race and his antisemitism[171] reflected some trends of thought in Germany during the 19th century. Under a pseudonym in the Neue Zeitschrift für Musik, Wagner published the essay "Das Judenthum in der Musik" in 1850 (originally translated as "Judaism in Music", by which name it is still known, but better rendered as "Jewishness in Music.") The essay attacked Jewish contemporaries (and rivals) Felix Mendelssohn and Giacomo Meyerbeer, and accused Jews of being a harmful and alien element in German culture.
Wagner stated the German people were repelled by Jews' alien appearance and behaviour: "with all our speaking and writing in favour of the Jews' emancipation, we always felt instinctively repelled by any actual, operative contact with them."
He argued that because Jews had no connection to the German spirit, Jewish musicians were only capable of producing shallow and artificial music. They therefore composed music to achieve popularity and, thereby, financial success, as opposed to creating genuine works of art.[172] Wagner republished the pamphlet under his own name in 1869, with an extended introduction, leading to several public protests at the first performances of Die Meistersinger. He repeated similar views in later articles, such as "What is German?" (1878, but based on a draft written in the 1860s).[173]
Some biographers[174] have suggested that antisemitic stereotypes are also represented in Wagner's operas. The characters of Mime in the Ring, Sixtus Beckmesser in Die Meistersinger, and Klingsor in Parsifal are sometimes claimed as Jewish representations, though they are not explicitly identified as such in the libretto. Moreover, in all of Wagner's many writings about his works, there is no mention of an intention to caricature Jews in his operas; nor does any such notion appear in the diaries written by Cosima Wagner, which record his views on a daily basis over a period of eight years.[175]
Despite his very public views on Jews, throughout his life Wagner had Jewish friends, colleagues and supporters.[176] In his autobiography, Mein Leben, Wagner mentions many friendships with Jews, referring to that with Samuel Lehrs in Paris as "one of the most beautiful friendships of my life."[177]
The topic of Wagner and the Jews is further complicated by allegations, which may have been credited by Wagner himself, that he himself was of Jewish ancestry, via his supposed father Geyer.[178] In reality, Geyer was not of Jewish descent, nor were either of Wagner's official parents. References to Wagner's supposed 'Jewishness' were made frequently in cartoons of the composer in the 1870s and 1880s, and more explicitly by Friedrich Nietzsche in his essay "The Wagner Case", where he wrote "a Geyer (vulture) is almost an Adler (eagle)".[179] (Both 'Geyer' and 'Adler' were common Jewish surnames.)
Some biographers have asserted that Wagner in his final years came to believe in the racialist philosophy of Arthur de Gobineau, and according to Robert Gutman, this is reflected in the opera Parsifal.[180] Other biographers such as Lucy Beckett[181] believe that this is not true. Wagner showed no significant interest in Gobineau until 1880, when he read Gobineau's "An Essay on the Inequality of the Human Races".[182] Wagner had completed the libretto for Parsifal by 1877, and the original drafts of the story date back to 1857. Wagner's writings of his last years indicate some interest in Gobineau's idea that Western society was doomed because of miscegenation between "superior" and "inferior" races.[183]
[edit] Other interpretations
Wagner's ideas were amenable to socialist interpretations, which is not surprising given the composer's revolutionary inclinations in the 1840s, when many of his ideas on art were being formulated. Thus for example, George Bernard Shaw wrote in The Perfect Wagnerite (1883):
[Wagner's] picture of Niblunghome [Shaw's anglicization of Nibelheim, the empire of Alberich in the Ring Cycle] under the reign of Alberic is a poetic vision of unregulated industrial capitalism as it was made known in Germany in the middle of the nineteenth century by Engels's Condition of the Laboring Classes in England [184]
Left-wing interpretations of Wagner also inform the writings of Theodor Adorno amongst other Wagner critics.[185] Walter Benjamin gave Wagner as an example of "bourgeois false consciousness", alienating art from its social context.[186]
The writer Robert Donington has produced a detailed, if controversial, Jungian interpretation of the Ring cycle. Others have also applied psychoanalytical techniques to Wagner's life and works.[187]
Others have sought to place Wagner's work in a more generalised sociohistoric framework. For example, Ehrhard Bahr suggests that 'Wagner provided the middle class with a medium to transfer its familial and political conflicts into a myth of supposedly common Germanic past'.[188]
Nazi appropriation
Adolf Hitler was an admirer of Wagner's music and saw in his operas an embodiment of his own vision of the German nation. There continues to be debate about the extent to which Wagner's views might have influenced Nazi thinking.[189] The Nazis used those parts of Wagner's thought that were useful for propaganda and ignored or suppressed the rest.[190] Although Hitler himself was an ardent fan of "the Master", many in the Nazi hierarchy were not and, according to the historian Richard Carr, resented attending these lengthy epics at Hitler's insistence.[191]
There is evidence that music of Wagner was used at the Dachau concentration camp in 1933/4 to 'reeducate' political prisoners by exposure to 'national music'.[192] However there seems to be no evidence to support claims, sometimes made,[193] that his music was played at Nazi death camps during the Second World War.[194]
Because of the associations of Wagner with antisemitism and Nazism, the performance of his music in the State of Israel has been a source of controversy.[195]
2012.03.07 23:08
2012.03.08 01:00
일제 강점기에 소위 일제에 동조한 친일 인사명단을 책으로
만들었다는 뉴스를 보고 마음이 착잡했었습니다.
이렇게 당당하게 그들을 비판하는 이들은 누구일까?
안중근의사의 후손이라도 되는것일까? 아마도 그들은 일제 강점기에
태어 나지도 않았던 사람들일것이다.
일제 강점기에 숨도 제대로 쉬지 못할 절대 극명의 시절에 어떻게
그사람들 하나 하나를 안중근 의사와 같이 행동하기를 바랄수 있을까?
그들도 귀중한 생명을 갖은 인간이었으며 돌보야할 가족이 있지
않았던가? 이들을 비판하며 책자까지 만든 그사람들이 그런 입장에
처했으면 그들은 과연 안중근의사나 이준열사 같은 행동을 했을까?
그시절에 하늘을 우러러 한줌 부끄러움이 없을 사람은 몇명이나 될까?
이런일들이 우리 역사의 부끄러운 시대여서 그걸 거울 삼아 다시는
그런 상황을 만들지 않게 다들 노력을 할것이지 반세기도 훨씬넘은
지금 그것들을 들추어낼 필요가 있을까? 더구나 그것을 정치적으로
이용한다면 그것 또한 죄악이라고 생각한다.
남을 비판하기전에 자기자신을 돌아보는 지혜가 필요하다 생각한다. 규정
2012.03.08 15:02
1.
The orientation lecture was about the human nature we inherited and the pitfalls we (prison staff) are facing,
abuse of the authority. Majority marches to the authority's marching band as faithful citizens, like the police
forces in 4.19 era in Korea or current Syrian Army.
They do not mind shooting unarmed civilian demonstrators if his superior orders so without much thinlking.
Very few go AWOL.
I heard when Adolf Eichmann was put on trial in Jerusalem, being whisked away by Israel's intelligence agent,
he argued that he just "followewd orders", without much argument like the majority of german citizens or like
majority of experimental subjects in the previously cited experiments in Yale and Stanford.
I truely believe he was giving an honest answer.
Human being is dominating this planet just because of our inheritied genes were made as such.
****
US government did not ask the soldiers to do this in Iraq prison.
2.
But a minority does the opposite things.
In Germany and France during the WW II, minority did not march with Hitler.
Some ran away to England and followed De Gaule.
This is the story of one German.
Years under Nazi regime
Election gains of Nazi party candidates in municipal, state and national elections in 1930 and 1932 were
significant. Adenauer, as mayor of Cologne and president of the Prussian State Council, still believed that improvements in the national economy would make his strategy work: ignore the Nazis and concentrate on the Communist threat. He was "surprisingly slow in his reaction" to the Nazi electoral successes,[5] and even when he was
already the target of intense personal attacks, he thought that the Nazis should be part of the Prussian and national governments based on election returns. Political maneuverings around the aging President Hindenburg then brought the Nazis to power on January 30, 1933.
By early February Adenauer finally realized that all talk and all attempts at compromise with the Nazis were futile.
Cologne's city council and the Prussian parliament had been dissolved; on April 4, 1933 he was officially
dismissed as mayor and his bank accounts frozen. "He had no money, no home and no job."
After arranging for the safety of his family, he appealed to the abbot of the Benedictine monastery at Maria Laach for a stay of several months. His stay at this abbey, which lengthened to a full year, was cited by the abbot after the war when Adenauer was accused by Heinrich Böll and others of collaboration with the Nazis.
According to Albert Speer in his book Spandau: The Secret Diaries, Hitler expressed admiration for Adenauer,
noting his civic projects, the building of a road circling the city as a bypass, and a "green belt" of parks. However,
both Hitler and Speer concluded that Adenauer's political views and principles made it impossible for him to play
any role in Nazi Germany.
He was imprisoned briefly after the Night of the Long Knives in mid-1934. During the next two years,
he changed residences often for fear of reprisals against him, while living on the benevolence of friends.
With the help of lawyers in August 1937 he was successful in claiming a pension; he received a cash settlement
for his house which had been taken over by the city of Cologne, his unpaid mortgage, penalties and taxes were
waived. With reasonable financial security he managed to live in seclusion for some years. After the failed assassination attempt on Hitler in 1944, he was imprisoned for a second time as an opponent of the regime. He fell ill and
credited Eugen Zander, a former municipal worker in Cologne and communist, with saving his life. Zander, then
a section Kapo of a labor camp near Bonn discovered Adenauer's name on a deportation list to the East and
managed to get him admitted to a hospital. Adenauer was subsequently rearrested (and so was his wife),
but in the absence of any evidence against him was released from prison at Brauweiler in November 1944.
Shortly after the war ended the American occupation forces installed him again as Mayor of heavily bombed
Cologne. After the transfer of the city into the British zone of occupation the Director of its Military Government,
General Gerald Templer, dismissed Adenauer for what he said was his alleged incompetence.
After his dismissal as Mayor of Cologne, Adenauer devoted himself to building a new political party, the Christian Democratic Union (CDU), which he hoped would embrace both Protestants and Roman Catholics in a single party. In January 1946, Adenauer initiated a political meeting of the future CDU in the British zone in his role as doyen (the oldest man in attendance, Alterspräsident) and was informally confirmed as its leader.
Adenauer worked diligently at building up contacts and support in the CDU over the next years, and he sought with varying success to impose his particular ideology on the party. His was an ideology at odds with many in the CDU, who wished to unite socialism and Christianity; Adenauer preferred to stress the dignity of the individual, and he considered both communism and Nazism materialist world views that violated human dignity.[7]
Adenauer's leading role in the CDU of the British zone won him a position at the Parliamentary Council of 1948, called into existence by the Western Allies to draft a constitution for the three western zones of Germany. He was the chairman of this constitutional convention and vaulted from this position to being chosen as the first head of government once the new "Basic Law" had been promulgated in May 1949.
2012.03.08 16:27
Adolf Eichmann, SS official in charge of deporting European Jewry. Germany, 1943.
— DIZ Muenchen GMBH, Sueddeutscher Verlag Bilderdienst
One of the most pivotal actors in the deportation of European Jewry during the Holocaust, Adolf Eichmann (1906-1962) was born in Solingen, Germany, on March 19, 1906.
In his youth, he moved with his family to Linz, Austria, where he completed his basic schooling and began training in mechanical engineering, without, however, ultimately finishing his studies. In the uncertain economic times of the 1920s, he drifted from job to job, as a day laborer, an office worker, and as a
traveling salesman for Vacuum Oil Company, AG.
In 1932, at the instigation of an acquaintance, Ernst
Kaltenbrunner, who would later serve as his superior in the Reich Security Main Office (Reichssicherheitshauptamt, or RSHA), Eichmann entered the Austrian National Socialist (Nazi) Party, and the SS.
In August 1933, Eichmann joined the "Austrian Legion," an association organized in Bavaria for unemployed Nazi Party members from Austria; here Eichmann engaged in a few months' military training.
In 1934, with the rank of SS-Scharführer (Sergeant) Eichmann joined the Security Service Main Office (Sicherheitsdienst (SD)-Hauptamt) and still worked for this organization when it became part of the RSHA in 1939.
In the mid-1930s, Eichmann worked for SD office II-112, which had among its objectives the surveillance of Jewish organizations. Assigned to a section dealing with Zionist activities, Eichmann negotiated with Zionist functionaries and made an inspection tour of Palestine in 1937; his efforts to promote a "Zionist emigration of Jews from Germany by all [available] means" served him well in preparing him for his future activities.
After the Anschluss in March 1938, during which he personally led a raid on the Jewish Cultural Community offices, Eichmann worked to organize a Central Office for Jewish Emigration (Zentralstelle für jüdische Auswanderung) in
Vienna, which opened officially on August 20, 1938. According to internal
estimates, the Central Office "facilitated" the emigration of 110,000 Austrian
Jews between August 1938 and June 1939.
The Central Office was so successful in its forced emigration efforts that it created a template -- often called the "Vienna Model" -- for a Reich-wide Reich Central Office for Jewish Emigration (Reichzentrale für jüdische Auswanderung).
Eichmann led the Central Office beginning in October 1939. Here he met with less "success," particularly as deportation of Jews began to replace emigration as a strategy for a "Jew-free" Germany. In this area, Eichmann was to play a pivotal role. In the summer of 1939, Eichmann became responsible for promoting the expulsion of Czech Jews from the newly annexed Protectorate of Bohemia and Moravia, and created a further Central Office for Jewish Emigration in Prague, after the pattern of its Viennese counterpart. Shortly after the outbreak of World War II, he organized the first actual attempt at mass deportation from the so-called Greater German Reich. Eichmann coordinated the deportation of some 3,500 Jews from Moravia and Vienna to Nisko on the San River, in that part of German-occupied Poland to be designated as the Generalgouvernement. Although problems with the deportation effort and a change in German policy put an end to these deportations, Eichmann's superiors were sufficiently satisfied with his initiative to ensure that he would play a role in future deportation proceedings.
After the foundation of the RSHA in September 1939, Eichmann moved from the SD to the Gestapo and became director of RSHA section (Referat) IV D 4 (Clearing Activities, or Räumungsangelegenheiten) (1940), and, after March 1941, IV B 4 (Jewish Affairs, or Judenreferat). In October 1940, Eichmann and the office IV D 4 organized the deportation of nearly 7,000 Jews from Baden and Saarpfalz to areas of unoccupied France. From his position in RSHA section IV B 4, however, Eichmann played his central role in the deportation of over 1.5 million Jews from all over Europe to killing centers and killing sites in occupied Poland and in parts of the occupied Soviet Union.
In the autumn of 1941, Eichmann, now an SS-Obersturmbannführer (Lieutenant Colonel) and the chief of RSHA section IV B 4, took part in discussions in which the annihilation of the European Jews was planned.
His life story sounds like our fathers and mothers
during Japanese colonial rule(1910-1945).
Lee Kwang-soo, one of the greatest novelists
ever born in Korea, was the Only Collaborator
for Japanese Imperialism during those period?
Let's think about Collaboration vs Survival.
Any other choice they had?